Sign up and join the discussion. Instant Activation Click here to register in a few simple steps. Users from the disgraced MYPROANA.COM will be closely monitored and banned indefinitely on first instance of rule breakage. This isn't a circus.
Sign up and join the discussion. Instant Activation Click here to register in a few simple steps. Users from the disgraced MYPROANA.COM will be closely monitored and banned indefinitely on first instance of rule breakage. This isn't a circus.
Sign up and join the discussion. Instant Activation Click here to register in a few simple steps. Users from the disgraced MYPROANA.COM will be closely monitored and banned indefinitely on first instance of rule breakage. This isn't a circus.

Thread Contributor: TheGreatCornholioThe science of women and 80-20
#1
Which is really more like 80-10-10

Basically, women find 80% of men unattractive, 10% of men acceptable, and 10% of men attractive. The sliver lining? Wide variance on which men women consider attractive. It's not the same 10%. It's actually closer to 30% of guys who some women find attractive. Only about 3% of men are universally attractive.

NCBI/PubMed - Male dominance rank and reproductive success in chimpanzees
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19498952
Genome Research - A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity
http://genome.cshlp.org/content/25/4/459.full.pdf

This study on Y chromosomes shows that men have always been less attractive than women. At one point 1 man was reproducing with 17 women and that today's preference ratio of ~8 women wanting ~2 men has always been that way.

The long term scale is 5/1.5

Five women were consistently reproducing for every one point five men or a 3 to 10 ratio. That's damn near perfectly in line with the 80% of women going for 20% of men. 



RSOS - Polygyny without wealth: popularity in gift games predicts polygyny in BaYaka Pygmies
http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/c...2/5/150054
Australian Government Law Reform Commision - Aboriginal Marriages and Family Structures: Marriage in Traditional Aboriginal Societies
http://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/12.%...l-societie

http://genome.cshlp.org/content/25/4/459.full.pdf



And since I know how much y'all love Tinder here's a fun one just about Tinder
Quote:It was determined that the bottom 80% of men are competing for the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are competing for the top 20% of men. The Gini coefficient for the Tinder economy was calculated to be 0.58.  This means that the Tinder economy has more inequality than 95.1% of all the world’s national economies.  In addition, it was determined that a man of average attractiveness would be “liked” by approximately 0.87% (1 in 115) of women on Tinder. 
Most women can agree if a guy is really attractive or really unattractive.  Women are more likely to disagree on the attractiveness of men in the middle of the economy.
 
http://worst-online-dater.tumblr.com/pos...ss-you-are

Here is a calculator to estimate how likely a woman is to swipe right, based on the man's attractiveness as a percentage of the population(higher means hotter)
http://www.wolframalpha.com/widgets/gall...da5d6e57e4

[Image: tumblr_inline_nlr05o2sPf1s2aj59_500.jpg]

neomancr Wrote:Being fat is part of your personality. You made yourself fat and won't lose weight. Sorry bro. That's all you.
meomeowmeoww Wrote:Its better to be a hot girls tampon/wallet than an ugly girls bf.
Reply
#2
Content prohibited from guest view. Click here to register.

[Image: ANADIOTIS-NIKOS--780x443.png]
Reply
#3
Content prohibited from guest view. Click here to register.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)