Sign up and join the discussion. Instant Activation Click here to register in a few simple steps.
Sign up and join the discussion. Instant Activation Click here to register in a few simple steps.
Sign up and join the discussion. Instant Activation Click here to register in a few simple steps.

Thread Contributor: forever_incelIt’s starting boyos...
#1
Holy shit... im shaking


https://imgur.com/a/tuisFBQ


@Vitriol embed this link
@TheGreatCornholio
@crosshold
@jason
@uglyboy
@Pencil_Neck_Chad
@OVOChad
@BombsAway
@PizzaLad
@netro

[Image: N2tmlxa.jpg]
Reply
#2
http://theweek.com/articles/772276/peril...ual-moment
Reply
#3
(05-20-2018, 02:09 PM)laflame Wrote: http://theweek.com/articles/772276/peril...ual-moment

Clearly, she's bringing the big ideas
Quote:The problem is not that sex has been over commodified as hardline feminists and conservatives (talk about strange bedfellows!) like to assert; the problem is that it hasn't been commodified enough. 

Quote:This will require liberals to start taking the plight of people like the incels seriously, and stop penalizing intellectual mavericks like Hanson who have the nerve speak up on their behalf.
I don't think she understands what the liberal movement decided to become around 2013. Which is about 1/3 of the population who cry bullies and screams down the other 2/3 to maintain absolute control over everything - especially wrong-think. Wrong-think is the most dangerous thing someone can engage in.

Physical violence is simply a type of speech you can use against people who engage in the most dangerous type of violence, which is disagreeing with their "woke" betters.

TransistorBass-303 Wrote:I need Fat Acceptance because the alternative is self improvement.

Reply
#4
The answer to this is not redistribution of sex, because you can't tame a woman's sexual desire for only Chad, much like you can't tame a males pent up sexual frustration. The sexes are at odds with each other because females are far more choosy. 

The answer is that we need to invest more money in to Android Suki Waterhouses. 




If every male had one of her there would be no incels and no male violence. Let's face it, male violence is simply an outburst of built up of sexual frustration. Males and females are only here to survive and replicate, so once you've got survival down, replication takes the front row. Women have no problem getting sex so they don't get angry about it. Most men are not sexually appealing to most women so they get angry. 

So I say, let's invest more money in hyper realistic sex boots to cure the incel epidemic.

Life is an endless series of trainwrecks, with brief, commercial like breaks of happiness. - Deadpool
Reply
#5
The only solution is to cull the population

You can go to the moon, invent a cure to every known disease and eliminate global poverty and still be regarded as creep by roasties.



You can be villainous murderer, baby killer and drug lord and still be considered "just perfext x0x0x".



What you accomplish means nothing. Sub 6 PSL = death


Reply
#6
(05-21-2018, 12:25 AM)BombsAway Wrote: The answer to this is not redistribution of sex, because you can't tame a woman's sexual desire for only Chad, much like you can't tame a males pent up sexual frustration. The sexes are at odds with each other because females are far more choosy. 

The answer is that we need to invest more money in to Android Suki Waterhouses. 




If every male had one of her there would be no incels and no male violence. Let's face it, male violence is simply an outburst of built up of sexual frustration. Males and females are only here to survive and replicate, so once you've got survival down, replication takes the front row. Women have no problem getting sex so they don't get angry about it. Most men are not sexually appealing to most women so they get angry. 

So I say, let's invest more money in hyper realistic sex boots to cure the incel epidemic.

You may not be able to tame the innate desires of women but you can domesticate women. Just like you cant fully erase the instincts of a dog, but they are still domesticated. Domesticated dog attacks do happen, but relative to the number of dogs present and part of a househokd the frequency is very low. Similarly you can control the rates of adultery and hypergamy commited by women through a form of domestication, namely one that comes from a patriarchal administration of monogamy - 
which has Been proven to be effective (and at the very core a redistribution of sex).

[Image: N2tmlxa.jpg]
Reply
#7
(05-21-2018, 02:20 AM)forever_incel Wrote: You may not be able to tame the innate desires of women but you can domesticate women. Just like you cant fully erase the instincts of a dog, but they are still domesticated. Domesticated dog attacks do happen, but relative to the number of dogs present and part of a househokd the frequency is very low. Similarly you can control the rates of adultery and hypergamy commited by women through a form of domestication, namely one that comes from a patriarchal administration of monogamy - 
which has Been proven to be effective (and at the very core a redistribution of sex).
   

TransistorBass-303 Wrote:I need Fat Acceptance because the alternative is self improvement.

Reply
#8
Yu-geh-nics

[Image: tumblr_mtgueatUSj1s1zil8o1_500.gif]
Reply
#9
(05-21-2018, 02:20 AM)forever_incel Wrote: You may not be able to tame the innate desires of women but you can domesticate women. Just like you cant fully erase the instincts of a dog, but they are still domesticated. Domesticated dog attacks do happen, but relative to the number of dogs present and part of a househokd the frequency is very low. Similarly you can control the rates of adultery and hypergamy commited by women through a form of domestication, namely one that comes from a patriarchal administration of monogamy - 
which has Been proven to be effective (and at the very core a redistribution of sex).

domesticate me daddy
Reply
#10
(05-26-2018, 05:38 PM)OVOChad Wrote: domesticate me daddy


Fuark beat me to it

Lebensmüde
Reply
#11
(05-26-2018, 06:54 PM)Pencil_Neck_Chad Wrote: Fuark beat me to it

Shit you can beat my ass zaddy
Reply
#12
(05-21-2018, 12:25 AM)BombsAway Wrote: The answer to this is not redistribution of sex, because you can't tame a woman's sexual desire for only Chad, much like you can't tame a males pent up sexual frustration. The sexes are at odds with each other because females are far more choosy. 

The answer is that we need to invest more money in to Android Suki Waterhouses. 




If every male had one of her there would be no incels and no male violence. Let's face it, male violence is simply an outburst of built up of sexual frustration. Males and females are only here to survive and replicate, so once you've got survival down, replication takes the front row. Women have no problem getting sex so they don't get angry about it. Most men are not sexually appealing to most women so they get angry. 

So I say, let's invest more money in hyper realistic sex boots to cure the incel epidemic.

I'd love a sex bot and think realistic (like, indistinguishable or nearly so from a human) sex androids will change society. But what incels crave isn't really sex, it's love. If it were just sex, they'd just get prostitutes. The idea that no one they fall in love with will ever love them is what drives them bonkers. It's not unrequited lust but unrequited love that drives men to despair. 

I think people blame tinder for a lot of things but another thing is that it rapidly blackpills men on how undesireable they are. It used to be, oh she didn't like you, but there's a lot of fish in the sea, you just need to meet more women! But now you can get rejected by a hundred women in a day. There's not much you can do to cope with that if you're sentient enough to realize that some pictures of you is all she needs to know whether she's interested in you or not, otherwise no women would be on tinder or other online dating apps and sites.

This 'rapid rejection' basically means men can go through what used to be a lifetime of rejection from potential romantic partners in a day. And women can go through a lifetime of romantic proposals in a day. Sure some of those proposals are hey bby want sum fuk from an ugly old guy, but that's still validation. And those rejections are just from a few pictures and a bio, but they're still rejections. If anything, it's even harsher that they take a look at your face and think "I''ll pass."

I think it's one of those problems with no solution with today's technology. People say "how did the world get so messed up?" when literally nobody considers whether it will make people happier when they do something that changes the world. It's just, can I profit from this? And that decides the way things go. If anything this problem will get far worse before it gets better.

[Image: source.gif]
Reply
#13
They will create androids that can love, or at least pretend to love, so men can feel loved and validated and important. 

THOTs like that sig of yours is part off the problem too. Women are so validated they have become insanely entitled, and then they get it so the cycle continues and they get worse and worse. 

There are only three things that will reset the sexual dynamics:
1) mass die off of males so women have less choice and validation.
2) some form of disaster that makes life mostly about survival and your immediate circle.
3) complete annihilation of the internet.

Life is an endless series of trainwrecks, with brief, commercial like breaks of happiness. - Deadpool
Reply
#14
Double post

Life is an endless series of trainwrecks, with brief, commercial like breaks of happiness. - Deadpool
Reply
#15
I'd be depressed as fuck if I had to cope with a sex Android pretending to love me...
Reply
#16
(06-02-2018, 02:41 AM)BombsAway Wrote: THOTs like that sig of yours is part off the problem too. Women are so validated they have become insanely entitled, and then they get it so the cycle continues and they get worse and worse. 
Lindsey Pelas would have had piles of validation in any generation. If anything, hers is relatively diminished. In a past generation she would have been in the same position, but women who were 4s would be almost destitute. So the gap is closing. If anything internet dating is kind of like sexual socialism for fat chicks. They get to fuck guys they never would have gotten in a traditional settings. Lindsey always would have had access to literally anyone she wanted to fuck.

TransistorBass-303 Wrote:I need Fat Acceptance because the alternative is self improvement.

Reply
#17
(06-02-2018, 03:24 AM)TheGreatCornholio Wrote: Lindsey Pelas would have had piles of validation in any generation. If anything, hers is relatively diminished. In a past generation she would have been in the same position, but women who were 4s would be almost destitute. So the gap is closing. If anything internet dating is kind of like sexual socialism for fat chicks. They get to fuck guys they never would have gotten in a traditional settings. Lindsey always would have had access to literally anyone she wanted to fuck.

This x1000

Ive said this many times.

The true crime of social media is that it’s making a psl5s SMV virtually indistinguishable from a psl8s. Or rather it’s allowing for dumbass thirsty men to elevate the status of otherwise plain janes with slim bodies.

[Image: N2tmlxa.jpg]
Reply
#18
(06-02-2018, 03:24 AM)TheGreatCornholio Wrote: Lindsey Pelas would have had piles of validation in any generation. Lindsey always would have had access to literally anyone she wanted to fuck.
For sure, I'm not disputing either of these things. But it would have been hundreds of men she was exposed to day to day. Not thousands upon thousands. Thousands of people validating you is going to make you even more cunty than a few hundred.

Life is an endless series of trainwrecks, with brief, commercial like breaks of happiness. - Deadpool
Reply
#19
(05-21-2018, 12:25 AM)BombsAway Wrote: The answer to this is not redistribution of sex, because you can't tame a woman's sexual desire for only Chad, much like you can't tame a males pent up sexual frustration. The sexes are at odds with each other because females are far more choosy. 

The answer is that we need to invest more money in to Android Suki Waterhouses. 




If every male had one of her there would be no incels and no male violence. Let's face it, male violence is simply an outburst of built up of sexual frustration. Males and females are only here to survive and replicate, so once you've got survival down, replication takes the front row. Women have no problem getting sex so they don't get angry about it. Most men are not sexually appealing to most women so they get angry. 

So I say, let's invest more money in hyper realistic sex boots to cure the incel epidemic.

Here's a fact: men in relationships kill far more women (= their partners and wives) than incels have killed so far. Kinda wrecks your theory. Sex isn't a cure all for violent tendencies.
Reply
#20
(05-26-2018, 05:38 PM)OVOChad Wrote: domesticate me daddy

JFL at incel men explaining how to domesticate females.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)